Characterization of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Omicron Variant Shedding and Predictors of Viral Culture Positivity on Vaccinated Healthcare Workers With Mild Coronavirus Disease 2019.

In this prospective cohort of 30 vaccinated healthcare workers with mild Omicron variant infection, we evaluated viral culture, rapid antigen test (RAT), and real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of respiratory samples at days 5, 7, 10, and 14. Viral culture was positive in 46% (11/24) and 20% (6/30) of samples at days 5 and 7, respectively. RAT and RT-PCR (Ct ≤35) showed 100% negative predictive value (NPV), with positive predictive values (PPVs) of 32% and 17%, respectively, for predicting viral culture positivity. A lower RT-PCR threshold (Ct ≤24) improved culture prediction (PPV = 39%; NPV = 100%). Vaccinated persons with mild Omicron infection are potentially transmissible up to day 7. RAT and RT-PCR might be useful tools for shortening the isolation period.

CARACTERIZAÇÃO DA INFECTIVIDADE DA VARIANTE ÔMICRON E PREDITORES DE POSITIVIDADE DE CULTURA VIRAL EM PROFISSIONAIS DE SAÚDE COM COVID-19 LEVE

Introdução A variante Ômicron do vírus SARS-CoV-2 (B.1.1.529) foi designada uma variante preocupante (VOC) devido à alta transmissibilidade e capacidade de escapar da imunidade natural e induzida por vacina. Objetivo Caracterizar a duração da infectividade da variante Ômicron em indivíduos vacinados com sintomas leves de COVID-19. Método Estudo transversal com 30 indivíduos vacinados com COVID-19 para avaliar a duração da infectividade da Ômicron comparando o isolamento viral com o teste rápido de antígeno (RAT) e os valores de Ct da reação em cadeia da polimerase em tempo real (RT-PCR) de amostras respiratórias nos dias 5, 7, 10 e 14 a partir do início dos sintomas. Resultados O crescimento viral foi observado em 46% (11/24) das amostras dos indivíduos vacinados no dia 5 dos sintomas e 20% (6/30) no dia 7, nenhuma amostra teve isolamento viral no dia 10. A carga de RNA viral permaneceu detectável em 97% (29/30) e 57% (17/30) dos participantes nos dias 10 e 14, respectivamente. Entre as amostras com isolamento viral, todas (n = 17) foram RAT e RT-PCR positivas. Por outro lado, amostras sem isolamento viral (n = 97) foram RAT e RT-PCR positivas em 36 (37%) e 83 (86%), respectivamente. RAT e RT-PCR evidenciaram sensibilidade global e valores preditivos negativos de 100%, porém, RAT apresentou 63% de especificidade global e 32% de valor preditivo positivo (VPP), enquanto RT-PCR evidenciou menor especificidade (14%) e VPP (17%) para predizer a infectividade. Conclusão Indivíduos vacinados imunocompetentes com infecção por Ômicron ainda podem transmitir o vírus no 7° dia de sintomas, portanto, é altamente improvável que estejam transmitindo o vírus infeccioso no dia 10. Testes rápidos de antígeno podem ser usados para estimar a duração da infectividade dos casos de Ômicron. Ag. Financiadora Instituto todos pela saúde do Banco Itaú.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in an acute care hospital in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: The impact of COVID-19 on healthcare- associated infections (HCAI) caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria that contribute to higher mortality is a growing area of study METHODS: This retrospective observational study compares the incidence density (ID) of HCAI caused by MDR bacteria (CRE, CRAB, CRP, MRSA and VRE) pre-COVID (2017-2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) in overall hospitalized patients and in intensive care (ICU) units. RESULTS: We identified 8,869 HCAI, of which 2,641 (29.7%) were caused by bacterial MDR, and 1,257 (14.1%) were from ICUs. The overall ID of MDR infections increased 23% (P < .005) during COVID-19. The overall per-pathogen analysis shows significant increases in infections by CRAB and MRSA (+108.1%, p<0.005; +94.7%, p<0.005, respectively), but not in CRE, CRP, or VRE. In the ICU, the overall ID of MDR infections decreased during COVID, but that decline was not significant (-6.5%, P = .26). The ICU per-pathogen analysis of ID of infection showed significant increases in CRAB and MRSA (+42.0%, P = .001; +46.2%, P = .04), significant decreases in CRE and CRP (-26.4%, P = .002; -44.2%, P = 0.003, respectively) and no change in VRE. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic correlates to an increase in ID of CRAB and MRSA both in ICU and non-ICU setting, and a decrease in ID of CRE and CRP in the ICU setting. Infection control teams should be aware of possible outbreaks of CRAB and MRSA and promote rigorous adherence to infection control measures as practices change to accommodate changes in healthcare needs during and after the pandemic.

Procalcitonin as a biomarker for ventilator associated pneumonia in COVID-19 patients: Is it an useful stewardship tool?

Ventilator associated pneumonia(VAP) is a severe complication that can lead to high mortality when not early identified or when therapy is delayed. The aim of this study was to evaluate procalcitonin(PCT) as a biomarker for VAP development. In total, 73 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were analyzed. PCT levels greater than 0.975ng/mL were more related to VAP. No association was found for C-reactive protein (CRP). The results show that procalcitonin may be a pertinent biomarker for VAP diagnosis and can be a helpful tool for antibiotic withdrawal.

Decontamination and re-use of surgical masks and respirators during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic increased global demand for personal protective equipment (PPE) and resulted in shortages. The study evaluated the re-use of surgical masks and respirators by analysing their performance and safety before and after reprocessing using the following methods: oven, thermal drying, autoclave, and hydrogen peroxide plasma vapour. METHODS: In total, 45 surgical masks and 69 respirators were decontaminated. Visual integrity, air permeability, burst resistance, pressure differential and particulate filtration efficiency of new and decontaminated surgical masks and respirators were evaluated. In addition, 14 used respirators were analysed after work shifts before and after decontamination using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and viral culturing. Finally, reprocessed respirators were evaluated by users in terms of functionality and comfort. RESULTS: Oven decontamination (75 °C for 45 min) was found to be the simplest decontamination method. Physical and filtration assays indicated that all reprocessing methods were safe after one cycle. Oven decontamination maintained the characteristics of surgical masks and respirators for at least five reprocessing cycles. Viral RNA was detected by RT-PCR in two of the 14 used respirators. Four respirators submitted to viral culture were PCR-negative and culture-negative. Reprocessed respirators used in work shifts were evaluated positively by users, even after three decontamination cycles. CONCLUSION: Oven decontamination is a safe method for reprocessing surgical masks and respirators for at least five cycles, and is feasible in the hospital setting.

Disinfection of 3D-printed protective face shield during COVID-19 pandemic.

This study assessed the disinfection using 70% ethanol; H2O2-quaternary ammonium salt mixture; 0.1% sodium hypochlorite and autoclaving of four 3D-printed face shields with different designs, visor materials; and visor thickness (0.5-0.75 mm). We also investigated their clinical suitability by applying a questionnaire to health workers (HW) who used them. Each type of disinfection was done 40 times on each type of mask without physical damage. In contrast, autoclaving led to appreciable damage.